[TowerTalk] CQ article error(?)

[Bill Aycock]

Right! But the sub panel is not a "service entrance Panel" which is all 
I am concerned with.
Bill-W4BSG

Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS) wrote:

> BUT note that this '"Bonding connection" between the green wire blocks 
> and the neutral blocks' is removable and *must be* removed if the 
> panel is used as a subpanel -- again, so that the only connection 
> between neutral and ground is at the service entrance (which may not 
> be where the panel is: e.g., our main breakers -- and one breaker for 
> the garage circuits -- are in the garage, back to back with the meter, 
> while the panel with all the other breakers -- technically a subpanel 
> -- is in the basement).
>
> Alan NV8A
>
>
> On 10/07/05 03:03 pm Bill Aycock tossed the following ingredients into 
> the ever-growing pot of cybersoup:
>
>> No- no added wire. The "metallic conductor" I refer to IS the neutral 
>> wire, but there is an added bond from that to the earth ground rod 
>> within the panel.
>> Significantly, ALL panels I have ever seen have this "Bonding 
>> connection" between the green wire blocks and the neutral blocks. 
>> Neither the green or the neutral is switched.
>
>
>

-- 
Bill Aycock W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama