[TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
k6xyz
k6xyz at sbcglobal.net
Sat Dec 16 10:14:18 EST 2006
Like someone else said....I don't believe that there is going to be a
stampede to the ham bands just because a 5 wpm test has been eliminated.
I have yet to actually meet someone who has not got a ticket simply because
of the code test.
Likely some folks will get a ticket because the requirements became slightly
easier.
As an Advanced class holder, you have already passed the code test for the
Extra years ago so I don't understand how eliminating the 5wpm test affects
a serious attempt at the Extra test.
Especially now since the sub bands have been expanded the apparent need for
the Extra has been reduced ....unless you want to work CW.....which you
apparently don't.
Regards
Dave Harmon
NSRCA 586
K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net
Sperry, Ok.
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Clint Talmadge
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 8:18 AM
To: 'Towertalk'
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
Dave,
As an Advanced ticket holder, I have for years considered upgrading to
Extra. Now the recent FCC change will inevitably bring more hams into our
ranks and the "General Sections" of the bands are going to be more crowded.
This is the last little push I needed to get off my duff and make a serious
attempt at the Extra test.
Clint - W5CPT -
----- Original Message -----
From: k6xyz
To: 'Bob Maser' ; jimc at pwrone.com ; 'Towertalk'
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
Well Bob....tell me seriously why I would want an Extra more now than
before??
Regards
Dave Harmon
NSRCA 586
K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net
Sperry, Ok.
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bob Maser
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 7:53 AM
To: jimc at pwrone.com; 'Towertalk'
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
Look on the bright side. With all them CB'ers getting their tickets, ham
radio equipment prices will drop. And think of all the channels we can
make
on the new 75 meter SSB band allocation.
Seriously, getting an Extra class license upgrade will become a top
priority
for the Advanced a General ticket holders.
Bob W6TR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Chaggaris" <jimc at pwrone.com>
To: "'Towertalk'" <towertalk at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
> Joe:
>
> Thank you, my sentiments EXACTLY.
>
> 73's
>
> Jim N9WW
>
> James Chaggaris
> President
> PowerOne Corp.
> 1020 Cedar Avenue
> Suite 110
> St. Charles, IL 60174
> Phn: 630-443-6500
> Fax: 630-443-6505
> Cell: 630-669-2241
> www.pwrone.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Subich, W4TV [mailto:w4tv at subich.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:47 AM
> To: 'Blake Bowers'; jimc at pwrone.com; 'Towertalk'
> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
>
>
>> As a HAM, I find your comment patently offensive.
>
> As a student of history I find your comment completely ignorant.
>
> The elimination of effective licensing requirements destroyed the
> Citizens Radio Service in the late 70's and early 80's. With US
> Amateur Radio license examinations so simple that a "even caveman
> could pass them," the Commission has put the Amateur Service on the
> same path to destruction.
>
> One need only listen to the trash that passes for VHF repeater activity
> in many of the larger metropolitan areas these days to see the future
> of HF allocations in the US. This comes on the heels of the largest
> expansion in voice allocations ever - entirely at the expense of
> spectrum for digital modes.
>
> Whether you like the way it was expressed or not, "breaker one-nine"
> is exactly what you will be hearing on the HF bands soon. The only
> winners are the freebanders.
>
> "Turn out the lights - the party's over." The fat lady just sang.
>
> 73,
>
> ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com
>> [mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Blake Bowers
>> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:53 AM
>> To: jimc at pwrone.com; Towertalk
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
>>
>>
>> As a HAM, I find your comment patently offensive.
>>
>> As a closely held national telecommunications
>> infrastructure provider, I don't let it offend me,
>> but I do tend to think twice about ever doing
>> business with a company that the president of
>> sends out such a message.
>>
>> And we use LOTS of shelters.....
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jim Chaggaris" <jimc at pwrone.com>
>> To: "Towertalk" <towertalk at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:15 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Breaker-one-nine
>> >
>> >
>> > Jim N9WW
>> >
>> > James Chaggaris
>> > President
>> > PowerOne Corp.
>> > 1020 Cedar Avenue
>> > Suite 110
>> > St. Charles, IL 60174
>> > Phn: 630-443-6500
>> > Fax: 630-443-6505
>> > Cell: 630-669-2241
>> > www.pwrone.com
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list