[TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 , other

[Kelly Johnson]

Well, this ordinance is just like all the rest: you can do what you
want until somebody complains.  I'm sure nobody will complain about a
dipole tied to a tree, but a SteppIR on top of a 70ft. tree in Gilroy
would almost certainly earn you a visit from Code Enforcement :-)


On 2/12/07, AA6DX - Mark <aa6dx at arrl.net> wrote:
> No waaarrrsss in trees?
> Wow ... first I have heard of that one.   Kinda makes you wonder, whatever
> happened that made the solons decide to enact that regulation?  Musta been
> some kind of "trigger"?   Or are others on the list encumbered with that
> ridiculosity?  73
> Mark Nelson  -  AA6DX
>
> mailto: AA6DX at ARRL.NET
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly at gmail.com>
> To: <towertalk at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 , other
>
>
> Trees are unregulated?  Don't be so sure.
>
> The zoning ordinance for Gilroy, Ca. specifically forbids attaching
> antennas to trees or utility poles!!!!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>