[TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 , other

[Joe Giacobello]

You would think that any city that bills itself as The Garlic Capitol of 
the World would be much more tolerant of antennas!

73, Joe
K2XX

Kelly Johnson wrote:
> Well, this ordinance is just like all the rest: you can do what you
> want until somebody complains.  I'm sure nobody will complain about a
> dipole tied to a tree, but a SteppIR on top of a 70ft. tree in Gilroy
> would almost certainly earn you a visit from Code Enforcement :-)
>
>
> On 2/12/07, AA6DX - Mark <aa6dx at arrl.net> wrote:
>   
>> No waaarrrsss in trees?
>> Wow ... first I have heard of that one.   Kinda makes you wonder, whatever
>> happened that made the solons decide to enact that regulation?  Musta been
>> some kind of "trigger"?   Or are others on the list encumbered with that
>> ridiculosity?  73
>> Mark Nelson  -  AA6DX
>>
>> mailto: AA6DX at ARRL.NET
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly at gmail.com>
>> To: <towertalk at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 , other
>>
>>
>> Trees are unregulated?  Don't be so sure.
>>
>> The zoning ordinance for Gilroy, Ca. specifically forbids attaching
>> antennas to trees or utility poles!!!!
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>