[TowerTalk] Carolina Windom, etc.
garyschafer at comcast.net
Sun Sep 9 19:11:18 EDT 2007
Sorry Jim, but I am not arguing. I fully agree with what you said and I
understand about cable loss.
I had unintentionally thought that the other Jim had posted what you had and
mixed the two in my last post.
My whole point that I was making is that swr does not change at different
points on the line as impedance does when there is a mismatch, except for
losses in the line, as I said in my very first post on the subject.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 11:06 PM
> To: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom, etc.
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 19:15:37 -0500, Gary Schafer wrote:
> >It seems Jim is still saying that the impedance mismatch transforms the
> >from one end to the other here. Also note that there is no mention of
> >loss either.
> NO. I didn't say that.
> Gary, instead of arguing, I suggest that you study the ARRL Antenna Book
> or any
> textbook on transmission lines. I'm quite sure of what I wrote in my
> post. It was true when I learned in in Engineering school in 1963, and
> it's still
> Jim K9YC
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
More information about the TowerTalk