[TowerTalk] Happy news for a change

[Russell Hill]

I would be very reluctant to challenge a politically entity which allows a 
given tower height by putting up that height of tower, as we understand the 
meaning, with mast and antennas up higher.  Why make them regret having a 
basically permissive ordinance when they can outlaw ALL towers and make 
amateurs have to fight to put up ANYthing?  "Win the battle, lose the war" 
comes to mind.

My $.02 worth.

73 to all,
Rusty, na5tr


> How is the ordinance worded? Park Township's (near Holland, MI -- but
> it's not the municipality in which I live) ordinance refers, I am told,
> to the height of the "tower." Thus some hams have argued that the mast
> they have protruding from the top of the tower doesn't count. I don't
> know whether that interpretation has ever been put to the test.
>
> 73
>
> Alan NV8A
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>