[TowerTalk] MACAntenna

Arthur Trampler atrampler at att.net
Wed May 20 06:47:42 PDT 2009


duh me...

--- On Wed, 5/20/09, Dubovsky, George <George.Dubovsky at andrew.com> wrote:

From: Dubovsky, George <George.Dubovsky at andrew.com>
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna
To: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler at att.net>, "Pete Smith" <n4zr at contesting.com>, towertalk at contesting.com, "Brian Gieryk" <ke6iyc at mac.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 8:47 AM

Probably a typo in your email, Art, but I presume you meant feet, not inches
;-)

73,

geo - n4ua

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Trampler
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:43 AM
To: Pete Smith; towertalk at contesting.com; Brian Gieryk
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna

That's easy Brian.
 
If the boom to mast is at the center of the boom, then one has 10.25" on
that side of the right triangle; 17.333 inches on the other side of the right
triange; and 20.13" turning radius.
 
Art

--- On Wed, 5/20/09, Brian Gieryk <ke6iyc at mac.com> wrote:

From: Brian Gieryk <ke6iyc at mac.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna
To: "Pete Smith" <n4zr at contesting.com>,
towertalk at contesting.com
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 8:11 AM

Perhaps a typo on their site, or an oversight, but how cane one have a  
turning radius (20 ft, 1 in.) LESS than the boom length (20 ft, 6 in.)?

Brian
KE6IYC

On May 20, 2009, at 4:41 AM, Pete Smith wrote:

> This year at Dayton, there was a vendor (www.mactenna.net)
> demonstrating something called the SB20-10 Simple Beam.  The basic
> principle was described in a QST article in September 2008, applied
> to a wire dipole, and I remember at the time thinking "You've
gotta
> be kidding."  Now, however, the inventor has incorporated the idea
in
> a 3-element yagi, and unless he has cooked the books, the EZNEC
> models look pretty good.  On all 5 bands between 20 and 10 meters,
> the models show very similar pattern and gain numbers and excellent
> SWR bandwidth, all without motors, moving parts (other than relay
> contacts), and at a decently low price.
>
> The manufacturer's web site is very forthcoming with information,
> which tends to inspire confidence.  Still, I'd appreciate  hearing
> what the gurus among us think.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> New Articles Daily - the Contesting Compendium at
http://wiki.contesting.com
> The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at
www.conteststations.com
> The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]



More information about the TowerTalk mailing list