[TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical, or Force 12 flagpole

[Mike Murphy]

I have an HF2V and can say that it works very well on 40 and holds it's own on 
80.  However it is very narrow on 80 (about 40kc's).

YMMV

 __________________________


Michael Murphy - KD8OK


kd8ok at yahoo.com


twitter.com/kd8ok
__________________________




________________________________
From: Frosty <frosty1 at pdq.net>
To: Tom Anderson <andersonww5l at sbcglobal.net>; towertalk at contesting.com
Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 4:45:13 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical, or Force 
12 flagpole

Tom none of those antennas will out play the HF2V. The only antenna that 
will do better is one that is at least 65 feet tall with at least 20 65 foot 
radials.


Charles F. Frost
Frosty K5LBU
frosty1 at pdq.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Anderson" <andersonww5l at sbcglobal.net>
To: <towertalk at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:26 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical,or Force 
12 flagpole


> Fellow Tower Talkians:
>
> A friend of mine gave me a Hustler 6BTV vertical which I was planning on 
> using to supplement my 40/80 inverted vee at 50 feet and my Tennadyne T-10 
> log periodic.
>
> Just wondering how the 6BTV plays against something like a Butternut HF2V, 
> DX Engineering's 40 ft 10-80 vertical, or Force 12s flagpole vertical? 
> Looking mainly for something decent on 40/80.
>
> Tom, WW5L
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk