[TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical, or Force 12 flagpole

[AA6DX - Mark]

HF2V --I HAVE ONE TWO ... worky worky, and -- strangely enough -- works 
fairly well on 6M ... using the in-rig tuner on my IC-736 and/or IC-756 P2. 
Have used the HF2V  for CQWWDXCW. and won 40M single band, a few years back. 
Also, on same roof, other end ... 6BTV /// works, but not as well as the 
Utternut.
CU - CQP as  K6H  (for Humboldt) --- Mark,     AA6DX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Murphy" <kd8ok at yahoo.com>
To: <towertalk at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical,or 
Force 12 flagpole


>I have an HF2V and can say that it works very well on 40 and holds it's own 
>on
> 80.  However it is very narrow on 80 (about 40kc's).
> Michael Murphy - KD8OK
>
>
> kd8ok at yahoo.com
>
>
> twitter.com/kd8ok
> __________________________
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Frosty <frosty1 at pdq.net>
> To: Tom Anderson <andersonww5l at sbcglobal.net>; towertalk at contesting.com
> Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 4:45:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical, or 
> Force
> 12 flagpole
>
> Tom none of those antennas will out play the HF2V. The only antenna that
> will do better is one that is at least 65 feet tall with at least 20 65 
> foot
> radials.
>
>
> Charles F. Frost
> Frosty K5LBU
> frosty1 at pdq.net
>
>r>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk