[TowerTalk] When is a 100' tower only 97' tall?

[mike at n1ta.com]

So all this time, we've been building as tall as local law will allow,
and we're shorting ourselves? The inches...the precious inches!

Mike N1TA


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] When is a 100' tower only 97' tall?
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu at w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, August 08, 2012 12:01 pm
To: towertalk at contesting.com

The top flat sections are only 8 ft tall if my memory serves me. So you 
might be down to 95 ft HI!

Mike W0MU

W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net

On 8/8/2012 9:40 AM, Chris wrote:
> I think this calls for a class action lawsuit! LOL!
>
> Chris
> KF7P
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Cqtestk4xs at aol.com wrote:
>
>> Been that way for years, Rohn 20 is the same. Rohn 45 and 55 is longer
>> and gives you a true 10 ft. On the other hand the DX station will never be
>> able to tell the difference between a 66 footer and a 68 footer.
>>
>> Bill K4XS/KH7XS
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 8/8/2012 3:25:39 P.M. Greenwich Standard Time,
>> johnb3030 at comcast.net writes:
>>
>>
>> effective height of a 10' section is only 9' 8.5". While not significant
>> for one section, it quickly adds up on a tall tower.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
> Apparently I am supposed to be more concerned about the way Mitt Romney spends his money than how Obama spends mine.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk