[TowerTalk] Modeling a ground plane

Jim Lux jimlux at earthlink.net
Wed Sep 10 12:08:58 EDT 2014


On 9/10/14, 8:11 AM, Bill Turner wrote:
> I am modeling a full size ground plane with four elevated radials for
> 40 meters using EZNEC v. 3.0. I have it six feet above ground.

so the soil is 2 meters away (or about 1/20th of a wavelength) from the 
radials.  That means that there is a significant effect from the soil 
(it's lossy).

>
> I noticed that changing the length of the radials has much less effect
> on the resonant point than changing the vertical element.
>
> For example, on 40 meters, changing the vertical element by one foot
> moves the resonant frequency by about 200 kHz, but changing all four
> radials by one foot moves the resonant frequency much less, only about
> 20 kHz or so.

Partly it's probably the soil, the other thing is that "elements" that 
are broad have wider,shallower resonances than ones that are narrow.  A 
"fat dipole" made with a cage has broader bandwidth than a single wire.

Fan dipoles have broader bandwidth than wire dipoles.

What your radials are is sort of half of a biconical dipole, with the 
cone squashed flat.

The theory for why this (fat dipoles have wider BW than skinny) is 
straightforward, but complex. You'll find that the resistive component 
of the impedance doesn't vary as much as the reactive component.  Larger 
diameter (or tapered) radiators have smaller reactive components, off 
resonance, and it varies slower.

If you're interested, I can find a reference, but most antenna texts 
sort of present the data for various a/l (radius/length) values, and may 
even show how the equation for the feedpoint impedance is derived, but 
ultimately that doesn't provide a good intuitive conceptual picture of 
what's going on (aside from "fields from various parts of the antenna 
interact", but hey, we already knew that).  I don't have my copy of 
Kraus here to see what he says, but that's where I would start.



>
> I'm curious why this is. I would have thought the effect would be the
> same.
>
> All comments appreciated.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>



More information about the TowerTalk mailing list