[TowerTalk] G5RV vs 40M dipole
Tom Osborne
w7why at frontier.com
Tue Apr 28 13:00:02 EDT 2015
I still think if you have room for a 105 foot antenna, it's way better
to put it up as a dipole and feed it with twin lead. There is nothing
magical about a G5RV except on 20 meters. On other bands it is just
some wire that you force RF into with a tuner. I can do that with my
80 meter dipole on any band.
I've seen glowing reviews of an AEA Isoloop :-) 73
Tom W7WHY
On 4/28/2015 3:41 AM, Bry Carling AF4K wrote:
> On the transmit side, I can usually work anything I can hear by having a 1000 watt signal
> versus a 100 watt signal. That more than makes up for the lost 1.2 dB from using that terrible
> G5RV.
>
> Then on the receive side I can make up a lot by the use of a modern NR system and two
> preamps to dig out weak signals, OR by having the alterbnative use of a vertical versus a
> horizontal antenna.
>
> I am not worried about this theoretical 1.2 dB loss. When there are other more important
> factors such as a small lot, or aesthetic requirements, then for many of us a G5RV can be
> the best compromise. I have the newer W8AMZ designed G5RV, which has glowing reviews
> and I am not at all worried about deplying it. After much study, I believe it is the best solution
> for my particular environment.
>
> YMMV
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list