[TowerTalk] AN Wireless
Kevin Stover
kevin.stover at mediacombb.net
Mon May 9 09:37:51 EDT 2016
He can "opine" all he wants.
He is an experience tower installer. He is NOT qualified to say the base
is "overkill", unless he's grown a mechanical engineering degree
recently. And who the hell does he think he is saying Trylon is "good
enough" for the average ham?
This wasn't opining, this was using his expertise as a tower installer
to talk people out of buying AN Wireless products and buy
Trylon...probably from him...on an internet mail forum.
On 5/7/2016 7:47 PM, ve4xt at mymts.net wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems to me the question isn't if AN makes good towers or whether they spec bulletproof bases. Clearly, they do. Dave is certainly to be congratulated for a first-rate installation.
>
> The question is whether an experienced, respected tower professional opining the base may be overkill, or whether Trylon is good enough for the average ham, rises to the level of defamation.
>
> Does anyone think it does?
>
> Difference of opinion does not equal defamation.
>
> 73, kelly, ve4xt
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On May 7, 2016, at 3:08 AM, David Gilbert <xdavid at cis-broadband.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> That's a pretty ignorant comment. I own an HD-70 tower and I have the pictures to prove it.
>>
>> http://www.ab7e.com/AB7E_Tower_Page_1.html
>>
>> It is indeed a brute. I'm actually afraid of heights, but that tower is so sturdy that as long as I'm strapped in with my full body harness and three straps I'm comfortable working up at the top. I've been up there in 60 mph winds and can barely feel any sway in the tower (with about 20 sq ft of antenna at the top). A local wireless ISP uses my tower and had to get an engineering study done on it to satisfy the local zoning people ... they came back and said that my tower was only 18% loaded.
>>
>> Educate yourself and read the engineering study referenced by VE7RF. The folks who vouch for the AN Wireless towers aren't shills ... they just know more than you do.
>>
>> By the way, my 70 foot HD-70 tower was installed per the recommended base at the time (2008). It was spec'd at 9 ft by 9ft by 5ft, which works out to be right at 15 cubic yards of concrete. Mine ended up slightly larger because of the nasty large rocks in my soil ... it's impossible to cut a clean hole here.
>>
>> Dave AB7E
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 5/6/2016 1:02 PM, J.P. wrote:
>>> Cue the AN shills...
>>>
>>> XX/7
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
--
R. Kevin Stover
AC0H
ARRL
FISTS #11993
SKCC #215
NAQCC #3441
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list