[TowerTalk] question on copper wire used for hairpins and the like...
StellarCAT
rxdesign at ssvecnet.com
Fri Oct 14 07:51:03 EDT 2016
Thanks Dave ... its 8 ga.
getting nervous with all the stuff yet to do. Here's something you'll
connect with: I have to fabricate my own bracket to mount the Optibeam
OB40-4 to the tower as with their system the center of mass is right on the
HUGE bolts that hold the boom sections together. So I have to space the
mounting plate away from the boom by 1/2". Using 1/2" x 3/4" aluminum bar
stock to do this.
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: David Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 9:22 PM
To: towertalk at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] question on copper wire used for hairpins and the
like...
Hi, Gary.
According to some online skin effect calculators I found, and assuming
that the hairpin is something on the order of 4 gauge wire, the current
at 4 MHz reaches an equivalent depth of 1.4 mils or so. It is of course
a logarithmic current density profile, but the equivalent uniform
density depth is around 1.4 mils. I doubt that the tarnish is anywhere
near that thick.
73 and good to that you're still plugging away on your new station,
Dave AB7E
On 10/13/2016 2:05 PM, StellarCAT wrote:
> So ... Force12 used (uses!) bare copper wire as their hairpins. I have a
> 80/75 rotary dipole that has a hairpin made from bare #10 wire ... it is
> now 11 years old and it looks dull – tarnished ... not corroded at all –
> just the dull brown color that copper gets to be ... is there any reason
> why that can’t be reused (I’m putting it back up)? I realize the skin
> effect will mean that only the outside such-n-such micrometers are used
> for conductance ... but would any resistance in the ‘tarnish’ factor in or
> would it appear to be the same today as it was when brand new?
>
> My guess is the answer is yes – it can be reused and it would continue to
> work as if it were brand new ... and my one point of argument towards that
> fact is that when it was up – for 7 years – there was no apparent change
> in the operation of the antenna! The SWR didn’t change, which is what the
> hairpin would most drastically effect ... the 2:1 bandwidth didn’t change
> noticeably (Q) ...
>
> thoughts and discussions...
>
> Gary
> K9RX
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list