[TowerTalk] 80 meter wire vertical
Jim Brown
jim at audiosystemsgroup.com
Wed Sep 13 18:00:12 EDT 2017
On 9/13/2017 2:28 PM, Bill via TowerTalk wrote:
> All this talk about 80 meter verticals got me thinking.
>
> For a wire vertical, suppose instead of a single wire, we replaced it with two wires separated by about three or four inches, connected at the bottom and top.
Several years ago, I did that with the vertical part of my Tee vertical
for 160M. It's two #10 or #12 THHN conductors, tied together bottom and
top, with separation on the order of 8-10 inches.
> Would the bandwidth be increased?
SWR bandwidth approximately doubled in my case.
> Would the resonant frequency of the antenna be lowered?
Yes, slightly. Wire insulation also lowers the resonant frequency
slightly. These effects are small, a few percent.
> Would there be any advantage to using the two wires?
The increased SWR bandwidth means less re-tuning of the power amp output
and slightly less loss in a long feedline. That's the only advantage.
The effect on field strength is negligible unless it's a very long
feedline, simply because coax loss is pretty low on 80M.
> Would there be any change in impedence?
Z at resonance won't change enough to matter (and difficult to measure),
but Z off-resonance will be lower because the resonance has been
broadbanded.
And yes, as KC4YN, adding more conductors will broadband the antenna
even more.
These are VERY old techniques. I recall hearing about them as a new ham
55 years ago.
Exactly the same thing happens with a tower, either as a radiating
element or as a passive reflector. Somewhere I've seen an equation for
the equivalent diameter of a triangular tower. As I recall, it's roughly
0.7x the width of one of the triangular sides.
73, Jim K9YC
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list