[TowerTalk] Square Hole or Round Hole for Self Supporter?
jimlux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Mon Jan 22 16:21:05 EST 2018
On 1/22/18 12:06 PM, Richard Thorne wrote:
> Clay,
>
> I emailed a fella by the name of Jeremy. He quoted me $2800 for a 10'
> hole.
>
> From the other post's on the subject probably a reasonable number. I'll
> still research the back hoe method. I'll bet will be less expensive to
> use a back hoe and have the dirt hauled off (if needed).
>
generally that's the case. Round piers are handy if you're already
drilling them for some other reason, or if you have limited room on top
(a 20 foot deep 3-4 ft pier will fit a lot of places)
There's also other schemes - shallower and larger in plan, for instance.
There have been discussions on this list a few years ago about a sort of
X plan -essentially radial reinforced concrete beams - you could be
pretty shallow, at the cost of having 10 or 15 foot "arms" sticking out.
There are lots of engineering alternatives - there's nothing "special"
about the "cube" as a base.
Or, if your self supporter isn't a "flagpole" and skinny - Tapered
towers: HV transmission towers, Windmills and Rohn BX have a lot of
taper. I suspect that you don't need a lot of "foundation" under the
feet for that - enough to keep the downwind leg from sinking, and the
upwind leg from lifting.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list