[TowerTalk] JK 402 versus CC XM-240

[Steve Baughn]

The JK 402T sure looks a lot like a W6NL moxon conversion no?

Steve, WD8NPL

-----Original Message----- 
From: Tony Brock-Fisher via TowerTalk 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 5:02 PM 
To: Towertalk 
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] JK 402 versus CC XM-240 

I would strongly recommend the JK402T over the XM-240. I know you asked 
about the JK402; but the JK402T is a much better choice - just take a 
look at the SWR curves of each antenna, and you will see that the JK402T 
is much more broadbanded.

I replaced a working CC 40-2CD, which is electrically identical to the 
XM-240, with a W6NL Moxon, which is very close to the JK402T.

One would not expect much difference, replacing a 2-element 40 meter 
antenna on a 22' boom with another 2-element antenna on a 22' boom.

In my case it was NIGHT and DAY, a tremendous and noticeable 
improvement. I attribute this to lower loss in the loading coils, and 
better directivity per element due to longer length.

The broadbandedness of the Tee-style loading design is amazing, and my 
AL-1200 amp requires little adjustment while covering all of the CW or 
SSB portion of the band in a contest.

I would not hesitate to recommend the JK402T, based on the performance 
and design. Others have commented positively on JK Antennas build 
quality and mechanical sturdiness.

No, I do not own one.

-Tony, K1KP

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk