[TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices?
jimlux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Tue Oct 20 18:33:12 EDT 2020
On 10/20/20 2:02 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
>
> Dielectric loading works as well in theory, but is obviously more
> difficult in practice.
I was thinking more about loading with a permeable magnetic material.
For grins one day I modeled an 80m vertical (fed
> against a couple of radials) with the vertical portion being 3 inch
> diameter PVC with a wire running down the center of it. By pumping DI
> water (relative dielectric constant about 3.0 if I remember correctly)
> in from the base of the tube I could shift the resonant point over 100
> KHz, thereby making it somewhat tunable. I shudder to think what it
> would take mechanically to support it, of course, unless I strapped it
> to the side of my tower with all the attendant coupling effects of doing
> so.
DI water is epsilon 80, so if you were to submerge the antenna in Lake
Tahoe, a 8 meter antenna is almost half a wavelength.
Of course, what you improve in terms of match, now you have to radiate
through the water/air interface.
>
> I think people have tried similar things using salt water, except
> without the wire. I think I even tried modeling that once but found the
> conductive loss was too high ... don't remember for sure.
>
There's someone at a Navy lab in SD who build a transformer that coupled
RF to a stream of salt water. It "worked" but not very efficient.
And people have built antenna with mercury or gallium as a liquid metal.
Or, with plasma (essentially neon tubes)
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list