[TowerTalk] Cover antennas - the good news and the bad news

[Mark - N5OT]

No worries.  Ward and I are beer drinking buddies and abuse each other 
regularly.  The joke is more like I have a different perspective and 
different priorities than many other people, and I enjoy sharing.

73 - Mark N5OT


On 10/30/2020 10:35 PM, chetmoore at cox.net wrote:
> Not a FLAME. But You would likely benefit from reading the k7lxc N0ax  tribander report. After raeading it I ordered the  C31XR.   Force 12 is no more  but some of their antennas  are  mechanically improved and sold by JK and there are A lot newer tribanders  I would like to see them  test on their antenna range.  Hint,  tests of some of the mosely and hy gain antennas  did not fare all that well.  I had a TH6, a TH3 , TH7 and  a classic ta33 all of which worked
> Pretty well..........in their day.   My th-3 is still a good  FIELD DAY antenna  and great as a mult antenna to grab  south American mults  so I don’t have to  rotate the c31.
>
> N4fx
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TowerTalk <towertalk-bounces at contesting.com> On Behalf Of Mark - N5OT
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 4:49 PM
> To: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cover antennas - the good news and the bad news
>
> You turd :-)
>
> I have a Classic 33 Tribander and I am still trying to figure out why anyone would put up something bigger.  It seems to work everything I call on it, and that makes me satisfied.  Maybe I should go lay in the yard too.
>
> 73 - Mark N5OT
>
>
> On 10/30/2020 5:26 PM, Richard Bell wrote:
>> I’m not trying to be the proverbial turd in the sandbox but I’m wondering about a thing or two.
>>
>> I took a quick look at the publications on the championradio.com page and have a question.  It seems the books were published a few years ago.
>>
>> While the design theory has not changed, materials and workmanship may have. My recent experience with Mosley left me a little concerned about the performance of the end product, in my case a new RV-7C vertical.
>>
>> Am I mistaken or did I miss a revision date?
>>
>> Since I may be acting like a turd, I will now go lay in the yard.
>>
>> 73 W5BXE RB
>>
>>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 21:30:33 +0000 (UTC)
>>> From: <k7lxc at aol.com>
>>> To: towertalk at contesting.com
>>> Subject: [TowerTalk] Cover antennas - the good news and the bad news
>>> Message-ID: <1832859067.494932.1604093433882 at mail.yahoo.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>>
>>> Howdy, TowerTalkians -
>>>
>>> ? ? Tnx for your identification of the aforementioned QST cover
>>> antennas. I was on the right track anyway - hi.?? ? The good news?
>>> The F12 C31XR is a terrific antenna. The bad news? The Mosley PRO
>>> series antennas are LOSERS. If you don't believe me, get a copy of
>>> our exclusive on-the-air yagi antenna test (available from
>>> championradio.com) and see for yourself. One of the PRO antennas we
>>> tested had negative gain on one band. Hard to believe the antenna's
>>> owner hasn't noticed the difference himself since they're installed
>>> in close proximity for instant comparison. Or maybe he has.??? ? Now
>>> back to regularly scheduled programming.??Cheers,Steve? ? ?K7LXC
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 10
>>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 22:03:19 +0000
>>> From: AB2E Darrell <ab2e at hotmail.com>
>>> To: "towertalk at contesting.com" <towertalk at contesting.com>,
>>>      "k7lxc at aol.com"    <k7lxc at aol.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cover antennas - the good news and the bad
>>>      news
>>> Message-ID:
>>>      
>>> <YQXPR01MB2469FA7F1D5CF6092347B21E9B150 at YQXPR01MB2469.CANPRD01.PROD.O
>>> UTLOOK.COM>
>>>      
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> Steve,
>>> Thanks for sharing the info on the test results book. I hadn't seen that and I will pick one up since I have a C31XR (will likely buy a 2nd when my tower project moves forward). Along the way I acquired a NOS Pro-67 real cheap and I was thinking of putting it up on a separate tower and leaving pointed towards SA/Carib. I might still do that since I already have it, but will read those results before I decide.
>>>
>>> 73 Darrell AB2E
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: TowerTalk <towertalk-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of
>>> k7lxc--- via TowerTalk <towertalk at contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 5:30 PM
>>> To: towertalk at contesting.com <towertalk at contesting.com>
>>> Subject: [TowerTalk] Cover antennas - the good news and the bad news
>>>
>>> Howdy, TowerTalkians -
>>>
>>>      Tnx for your identification of the aforementioned QST cover antennas. I was on the right track anyway - hi.     The good news? The F12 C31XR is a terrific antenna. The bad news? The Mosley PRO series antennas are LOSERS. If you don't believe me, get a copy of our exclusive on-the-air yagi antenna test (available from championradio.com) and see for yourself. One of the PRO antennas we tested had negative gain on one band. Hard to believe the antenna's owner hasn't noticed the difference himself since they're installed in close proximity for instant comparison. Or maybe he has.      Now back to regularly scheduled programming.  Cheers,Steve     K7LXC
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>