[TowerTalk] 16om vertical and the number of radials

[Jorge Diez - CX6VM]

OK thanks Paul

how can you measure that a radial system is still good over the years?

Maybe the cable is degraded, or is cutted in some points if animals are
around.

Is any easy way to determine that the radial system on a vertical antenna
is still good?

thanks!
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W

El vie, 2 dic 2022 a las 12:06, Paul Christensen (<w9ac at arrl.net>) escribió:

> Jorge,
>
> N6LF's material is based largely on measured results in support of
> theory.
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TowerTalk <towertalk-bounces at contesting.com> On Behalf Of Jorge
> Diez - CX6VM
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 9:57 AM
> To: Paul Christensen <w9ac at arrl.net>
> Cc: Ignacy Misztal <no9e at arrl.net>; tower and HF Antenna Construction
> Topics. <towertalk at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 16om vertical and the number of radials
>
> I think Paul wants to know the "real" situation, not theory. He want to
> know if the theory is 100% in accordance with real big stations with many
> radials on the antennas
>
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
>
> El vie, 2 dic 2022 a las 11:50, Paul Christensen (<w9ac at arrl.net>)
> escribió:
>
> > Ignacy,
> >
> > There's a lot of published information that addresses your question.
> > Some material is rooted in commercial applications and even more in
> > the amateur literature where modeling is compared with measured results.
> >
> > As a starting point, I would carefully read Rudy Stevens' material:
> >
> > https://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/design_of_radial_ground_systems/
> >
> > Paul, W9AC
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TowerTalk <towertalk-bounces at contesting.com> On Behalf Of Ignacy
> > Misztal
> > Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 9:25 AM
> > To: tower and HF Antenna Construction Topics.
> > <towertalk at contesting.com>
> > Subject: [TowerTalk] 16om vertical and the number of radials
> >
> > Do more radials on a 160m vertical bring more improvements than shown
> > by simulation?
> >
> > Most simulations show that going above 32 radials on 160m brings
> > minimal improvement, say 1 db to 2 max. Even for low angle signals.
> >
> > On the other hand, some really loud stations n 160m, say 5-10 db above
> > the crowd, use a massive amount of radials. This is for inland
> > stations, far away from salt water.
> >
> > Is there any discrepancy between modeling and real life performance
> > with the number of radials? Does adding radials beyond 32 help much?
> > Any real stories?
> >
> > Ignacy NO9E
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
>
> --
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>

-- 
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W