[TowerTalk] Topband: Radials on ground v FCP
Lux, Jim
jim at luxfamily.com
Tue Jan 11 17:46:29 EST 2022
On 1/11/22 1:55 PM, Wes wrote:
> I've already posted a copy of what N7CL posted to this group years
> ago. His work, as well as the work of others, can also be found in
> ON4UN's "Low Band DXing" starting on page 9-14 of the 5th edition.
> The answer is there.
>
> Additionally see: "A Closer Look at Vertical Antennas With Elevated
> Ground Systems" by Rudy Severns N6LF. He recommends 10-12 elevated
> radials as a minimum.
>
> Wes N7WS
My ON4UN is not readily to hand, so I couldn't check it.
Rudy has a wealth of modeled and measured data, but the only comparison
I saw with height of radials was between 8 feet (about 0.03 lambda) and
6" (0.002 lambda).
And the difference was <0.25 dB (Figure 13).
Jim's comment was that N6BT had recommended 20ft for 160m and that Jim
saw a significant improvement going from 6 ft to 20 ft. Which is
inconsistent with Rudy's observations.
But what I was getting at was not just the phenomenology but the
underlying physics.
The radials over ground thing is an interesting problem, because there's
a lot going on.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list