[TRLog] Do we need Advanced testers for TR?

[Tack Kumagai]

In message "Re: [TRLog] no, dammit, I said abort!"
    on 99/11/29, K3BU@aol.com <K3BU@aol.com> writes:

: Never had those problems with previous versions, same setup, same everything. 
: I guess I should be more conservative with "upgrading", wait untill others 
: will find the bugs. (I was using IC 781, 3 upgrades back it was running 
: smooth, without single hickup.)

In other community like Linux Open Source, there are several testers who 
tests the most newly released versions then major bugs will be fixed in that 
tester group. It must be impossible to remove all the bugs reported just after 
the release before the release. Because Tree has not all the supported Xcvrs or 
computer environments.

So why don't we have the Advanced tester group? This will improve the quality 
	---------
	Tack Kumagai JE1CKA/KH0AM
	Internet: je1cka@jzap.com
	http://jzap.com/je1cka/

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist:	  http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html