[TRLog] Conversion to CT 9.xx

[Kenneth E. Harker]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 07:34:49PM -0400, Michael L. Therrien, MD wrote:
> 
> Being a die-hard TR user, I refused to work FD with my club in CT.
> 
> Everybody else used CT 9.26 We wanted to merge my converted TR log into CT.
> 
> Tried to convert my *.dat log to CT version 8 with logconv then convert to
> version 9 of CT using 8to9 but the 15 meter CW shows up as 40N and the 10
> meter CW shows up as 20 in the band field.
> 
> Any thoughts?

Which part failed?  Does the CT8 format log created by logconv look rational?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth E. Harker      "Vox Clamantis in Deserto"      kharker@cs.utexas.edu
University of Texas at Austin                   Amateur Radio Callsign: WM5R
Department of the Computer Sciences         President, UT Amateur Radio Club
Taylor Hall TAY 2.124                         Maintainer of Linux on Laptops
Austin, TX 78712-1188 USA            http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist:	  http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html