[UK-CONTEST] WAB Contest

[Mike Farmer]

It appears to me that every time anyone says anything which could affect the
RSGB we are in "knocking the RSGB mode".   That is (in my opinion) one of
the reasons why many UK amateurs are not members of the RSGB.

Thank you Don for the update I was also around when WAB started (but
overseas) and can recall seeing publicity on it via the 9V1 society. So
there was something at that point. I did not join in as it was not at that
time my thing. (I have only just started noting US Counties). But I
obviously missed the UK end of the start and if they (the WAB) made no
efforts in the UK then as Don says its over to them.

Re the signing of e-mails I have said this before if you look at the e-mail
address you see all you need to know!!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald Field" <g3xtt at lineone.net>
To: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] WAB Contest


> Mike shows a touching naivety about how the world works, or is simply into
> "knocking the RSGB" mode.
>
> The fact, sadly, is that WAB is a shadow of its former self. I have been a
> columnist for 20 years, first on Amateur Radio magazine, then Ham Radio
> Today, and now RadCom. In that time, I have NEVER received anything from
> WAB. So it's by no means just an RSGB thing. On a handful of occasions I
> tried to chase them - as an early WAB enthusiast (check my book number!!),
> when it first started, I wanted to give them a platform. But I got little
or
> nothing for my efforts. I'm delighted to see that they now have someone on
> board who I suspect will be much more proactive.
>
> But the fact is, the way the world works is that any organisation wanting
> publicity needs to take care of that from its own end, not wait for others
> to contact them. There are lots of clubs, expedition organisers, special
> event station organisers, award sponsors, etc. etc. out there. As a
> columnist, I know full well that if I tried to chase them all up on a
> regular basis I'd never have a life.
>
> Here's to a resurgence of WAB!
>
> 73 Don G3XTT
>
> By the way, does anyone know why Mike never signs his e-mails with his
> callsign?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Farmer" <G3VAO at hortonbrook.freeserve.co.uk>
> To: <g4jvg at cwcom.net>; "Leslie Elliott" <g4ogb at thersgb.net>;
> <uk-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] WAB Contest
>
>
> > I think Les G4)GB made a very small error in his original message - he
> > should have said "there WAS a rift"   the fact that the memories have
> > deleted the reasons is a good reason why the RSGB AS OUR NATIONAL
SOCIETY
> > should take the LEAD and follow up such events and get put the U back in
> UK.
> >
> > I repeat the lead MUST come from the NATIONAL SOCIETY.
> >
> > 73 de Mike
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stephen Telenius-Lowe" <m01uzn00 at cwcom.net>
> > To: "Leslie Elliott" <g4ogb at thersgb.net>; <uk-contest at contesting.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] WAB Contest
> >
> >
> > > > there is a rift between WAB and RSGB, the ins and
> > > > outs being lost in the dim mists of time, I think
> > > > it all started during the
> > > > 'Crusades'..........anyway, that's why the
> > > > contests are not listed or reported in Rad Com.
> > > > Les, G4OGB
> > >
> > > This is simply untrue. Whether or not there is a rift, I don't know -
> > > there certainly isn't as far as I'm concerned - but as editor of
RadCom
> > > I'd be delighted to list or report WAB contests in the magazine. But I
> > > never receive *any* input from the WAB group - that's the simple
reason
> > > they're not in RadCom! Having said that, only last week my old friend
> > > John, G8XTJ, sent me an e-mail saying that he was now the WAB Contest
> > > organiser and could I list two WAB VHF Contests in the GB2RS news,
which
> > > I have been pleased to do (these are also on the RSGB website). The
> > > details of these two contests were received far too late for the
> > > relevant RadCom. Perhaps now that John is looking after the WAB
> > > contests, though, their publicity machine will start to work better.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Steve, G4JVG.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > UK-Contest mailing list
> > > UK-Contest at contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > UK-Contest mailing list
> > UK-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>