[UK-CONTEST] Numbers of G stations entering International contests

[Mike Farmer]

I think Peter has missed only one point in this I suspect one of the reasons
for their success is that the individual operators ALL get of their butts
(quaint US word!) and help with the many tasks around the station.  I know
of at least 1 group where 2 people set a field day station up (all of it)
then less than an hour before the field day started the other 7 arrived.

How many other groups comprise that sort of ratio between workers and
players?

73 de Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Hobbs" <peter at tilgate.co.uk>
To: "Contest Reflector" <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Numbers of G stations entering International
contests


Hi all,

I think it's fairly clear why the UK remains as a single area in BERU and it
has something to do with turkeys and Christmas.  In other words,  the top
GW/GMs would otherwise instantly become GB5CC lookalikes, at the expense of
the plain old G's, some high profile examples of whom would lose out big
time.

I do agree with Bruce that BERU remains an oasis of sanity, friendliness and
considerate operating in the often chaotic world of HF contesting.  If that
experience doesn't happen to turn you on nobody's forcing you.

Back to topic, a look at that site http://www.rdxc.org pointed out to us by
Clive earlier on made me stop and ask myself if those guys are actually

a) nicer/cleverer/more committed/competent, etc. than us?
b) their activities are funded by the membership of the national society?
(unlikely, I feel)
c) or by the government? (a few years ago, maybe)
d) commercial sponsorship? (not a bad idea) or
d) maybe the nights are cold and the pubs shut early??

Whatever, it's quite clear this degree of organisation hasn't come about as
a result of a few guys getting together for 2 or 3 hours every month or so,
but with the sort of commitment and attention to detail shown by some of the
major DXpeditions.

The fact is, they have come up with a highly successful formula which, if
you think about it, is similar in many respects to our new Jubilee contest.
The thing that particularly impressed me is the complete lack of PC
consideration towards lamers and the purveyors of excuses, i.e. if the QSO
doesn't check out properly (both ways), no points for either party,
penalties for bad copying, etc.  On-line feedback on your log is available
after the event, with details of all your losses and of course a results
booklet is mailed to all 730+ entrants.  They are currently delivering a 50%
annual growth in entries, with nearly 4000 calls in the logs!  Can we (or
even the HFCC) learn anything from this?

Regards

Peter, G3LET


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest