[UK-CONTEST] IOTA contest thoughts

Dave Sharred dave at g3nkc.fsnet.co.uk
Thu Aug 5 16:40:08 EDT 2004


It's good to see the comments from all about IOTA contest. Thanks to Don,
Chris, Dave (BUO), Jim, Zoli and Colin for sharing their views.

Colin, in my opinion , is very close to the mark; and I agreed with I think
all of his opinions. I was going to comment also; but he beat me to it.

After reading Jim's note; I was going to analyse the ratio of 15 pointers to
3 pointers; from our near 3000 QSO's. Sometimes, this is a trade-off in
working 40m, hoping to bag some G's and other islands at a slower rate, or
running 20m at a much higher rate but less average points per QSO!

As all of the leading stations know; mults are imperative though to having a
good final score; and your strategy has to maximise that also.

If we discouraged non-island stations from participating; it would surely be
a much lesser contest; lose it's appeal; and maybe end up with support
nearer to the BERU contest !!! This event is a major attraction in the
contesting calendar; and, as the adage goes; if it aint broke, don't fix it
!

Zoli's comment on the EU appeal is also very valid - strangely enough
though; this means that you don't necessarily have to put up big arrays;
especially for 80/40m, to be competitive - it is high angle radiation on
these bands.  From MD4K; JA were frozen out this year, by the disturbances,
as were most of the NA participants. It was pleasing however, to note that
KP2/AA2BU was doing very well; at least in terms of QSO's.  I suspect, as in
CQWW, there are "sweet spots" around the world to win the contest; probably
Eu is fortunate to be in the sweet spot, by virtue of the number of Islands
within a relatively small radius

I disagree on changing the mult rules - by having mults per band and mode;
it encourages one to use all bands and modes - this helps the overall QSO
rate for everybody; if the ruling were changed then maybe there is less
incentive to give your juicy mult out on, say, CW - you may find that single
mode entries would have the dominant score!

I too, like Zoli, would like to see automatic credit for our own island -
clearly some IOTA refs have a big choice of stations to call on , for their
own mult. I suspect that we worked more GJ stations than those heard from
GD! If this lines up with IOTA rules; this is an excellent point !

Finally as was also pointed out - this contest sports so many sections that
surely there must be a realistic category for all entrants. Any newcomer to
this contest is well advised to study the rules / categories/ results from
the previous year, before deciding what category he/she should compete in.

As a final comment; I just looked at our log for Jim, Dave, and Chris's
entry; and saw that we worked MM0Q on 2 band/modes only (80/40SSB); M8C on 4
bands (80/40 SSB/CW); and GU8D on 4 band/modes (80/20 SSB; 80/40CW).  What
this shows I am not sure - either conditions were poor on HF for local
inter-G; or we are all poor at passing our mults!  Something to think about!

73

Dave G3NKC
Member of the MD4K team; and QSL manager

PS - We will publish our score when we know what it is - we have major log
problems, that we are still trying to unravel!





More information about the UK-Contest mailing list