[UK-CONTEST] 28MHz Propagation
Steve Reed
steve at explore.plus.com
Mon Dec 13 19:12:53 EST 2004
Longish: probably skippable before you get to the end...
<snip>
From: Mike Farmer [SMTP:G3VAO at hortonbc.demon.co.uk]
2004 - 65 QSOs (Both days and all between 07:30 and 16:00) - 1st G
<snip>
Oops: your 2004 "result" may be a bit premature Mike! After a couple of HP
entries I decided to do low power phone again this year -
Station: G0AEV
Class: SO SSB LP
SSB QSOs: 183
SSB Mults: 48
Claimed Score: 17,568
I'm not sure what I dare say regarding ARRL 10m propagation. I thought it
was great! The reason I work this contest every year (18th consecutive
entry if I count right) is for the challenging mix of propagation modes and
changes in propagation that nicely compensate for the strategy restrictions
of a single band contest. Unlike other contests with single band entry
classes, participants in this test can't desert an unproductive 10m for
lower frequencies. They have to make best of "difficult" (but dare I say
it, more interesting) propagation. Its much more fun in such circumstances
when you know there are other people out there trying to make contact and
that they haven't all cleared off to where the rate is highest!
OK, the F-layer wasn't up to much this time - especially when compared with
CQWW SSB (35z+131c worked on 10m: difficult to believe it was only 6 weeks
ago). As noted by others, best band-opening directions (often scatter
paths) swung all over the place and a fair bit of concentration was needed
to make the best of it. Best DX here was two VK3's in a row on Saturday
morning. Most anoying DX: VQ9 someone-or-other working a list. MS was
reasonable (but then this contest was built around the Geminids shower to
ensure there would always be some propagation), as was troposcatter
(although the high pressure was wasted: too few Gs on) and Es (limited but
very useful) - and, incidentally, none of these "VHF" modes stop operating
when the sun goes down.....
Phone band propagation was notably poorer than on CW. At "dead" times I
sometimes monitored the CW portion of the band (at 0.5 MHz lower in
frequency its a good early warning for phone users). At 17.20 ish on
Sunday the W's came back in on CW for perhaps the weekend's best
propagation to the States (I heard Florida/Texas/Louisiana, all direct path
not scatter). I guess many Europeans had switched off by then. The
propagation only just made it up to 28.5 and as stateside were working each
other with strong(er) signals making oneself heard was a struggle. I only
made one QSO (W5PR was the man with the good ears). Then between 20.00 and
21.30 there was a splendid Es opening to I and 9A, but I think I had the
band to myself. I worked a small number of startled Italians: a couple of
them came back later in the opening to give me additional 59+ signal
reports. No one heard on CW at all. It beats me: this is supposed to be
the premier 28 MHz contest and here's 28 MHz operating in an expected
manner yet most entrants had gone to sleep already!
Propagation theory: you may want to switch off now
I don't really believe in one-way propagation although I have an open mind
on the subject - many people think it exists. In the cases I've looked at
there are satisfactory alternative explanations involving noise/QRM levels
or the fact that the station who can't hear you has his attention on
stronger signals from another direction. Very difficult to prove one way
or the other. Some stations really are deaf: PY5YA gets this year's prize
for apparent deafness - I couldn't get any response from him until he was a
true S9 signal with me, yet I worked other Brazilians whose signals barely
registered. Perhaps he has a very noisy QTH.
As for "grey-line", I prefer the term "dusk/dawn propagation" in this
context. This is because grey-line propagation is strictly an LF- effect
controlled by D-layer absorption and as the D-layer is effectively
transparent at 28 MHz, whatever is happening at dusk/dawn on 10m, it can't
be grey-line "as defined". Dusk-dawn phenomena at 28 MHz relate to changes
in layer ionisation, altitude and attitude, and combinations of these are
responsible for the in-and-out nature of band openings, especially those
commonly seen at the end of the day. The times when the band "dies" and
then comes back to "life" (often with quite different skip lengths) do not
correlate well with the time of dusk (as seen at hop mid-path points and at
F-layer heights, of course). This is because the F2 layer (unlike the
D-layer) retains ionisation after solar illumination ceases and because
recombination only happens relatively slowly - there are no sudden layer
changes when illumination goes. At this time of the year, highest critical
frequencies occur at, or close to, local noon and generally recombination
rates will increasingly exceed ionisation rates as the afternoon and
evening progress. At some point the ionisation will be insufficient to
support propagation (MUF drops below 28 MHz) but on poor days this happens
well before sunset while on good days the band will stay open well after
sunset. The interesting part is at near-MUF when small fluctuations in
layer morphology can bring a dead band back to life again. When such
effects occur exactly at sunset it is tempting to see a cause and effect,
but I believe this is illusory.
Steve, G0AEV
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list