[UK-CONTEST] Revision of our Licence
Dave Sergeant
dave at davesergeant.com
Thu Aug 4 09:19:52 EDT 2005
On 4 Aug 2005 at 13:57, Mark Marsden wrote:
>
> I have had discussions with colleagues here at work who work with Ofcom.
>
>
> I wanted clarification of what Ofcom meant by "Question 5: Do you agree
> that WT Act licence exemption for radio amateurs is not currently
> practical?"
>
> The opinion here is that in terms of the WT act there are some
> transmitters that are licence-exempt some examples of these are mobile
> phones, WiFi 802.11 and keyfobs.
>
> If Ofcom persue de-regulation of amateur radio the odds are that by
> then:
> 1) you won't have a licence
> 2) you won't be able to operate abroad
> 3) no DxPeditions (unless you already have an overseas licence)
> 4) no R&TTE exemption so individual homebrew equipment will have to be
> tested to ETSI specs
> 5) you won't be able to import amateur equipment that needs a licence
>
> There's more, but just this list alone prompted me to respond. I majored
> on the economic value of DxPeditions and how individuals spend tens of
> thousand of pounds on stations that need NOV's.
>
> Bear in mind that we are now communicating with economists, and there
> are some who think radio waves stop at county borders.
>
> 73 Mark G4AXX
I have read a small selection of the responses on the Ofcom site (at
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/aradio/responses/?a=87101)
and dispite wide differences in opinion on the matters of licence for
life and free licences they are unanimous in their rejection of the
idea of licence exemption in questions 5 and 6.
You will find my response there as sergeant.pdf - I seem to have
written one of the longer responses! And there seem to be rather a
lot more responses there now than there were when I checked earlier
this morning, maybe the message is getting through.
73 Dave G3YMC
http://www.davesergeant.com
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list