[UK-CONTEST] Contest logging software for general dxing
Ian White G/GM3SEK
gm3sek at ifwtech.co.uk
Thu Aug 25 10:05:25 EDT 2005
Steve wrote:
>
>I know of at least one person who is now using N1MM for sporadic es
>opening on vhf as its so fast to input and the bandmapping is great for
>spot hopping in an opening.
The N1MM bandmap is superb. Even when not using cluster assistance, it
maps the QSOs you've already made, so you know whose run frequencies you
can skip over in future.
>I too am coming around to the idea of using N1mm for general dxing and
>just using logger32 for award tracking and qsl management- I presume
>that you have imported your whole log via adif into N1MM and then run
>in dx mode?
I'm in the unusual position of having just started again from scratch in
a new country, so N1MM in "DX" mode contains my entire log. Each contest
is logged separately, and then those QSOs are copied into the DX log.
N1MM keeps a basic track of band/mode/country slots worked, pops up
details of previous QSOs, and alerts me to any new ones. This is exactly
the same information that it provides for contesting, and it's all I
need while actually sitting in front of the rig.
QSLing and award tracking is mostly book-keeping, and it can be done
anywhere, and at any time. So when I've had a few more QSOs from the
new QTH, I will export the complete log out of N1MM into something
better suited for QSLing and award tracking. (From the warm
recommendations here, that may well be Logger32.)
It's a truism that you can't optimize software to do too many different
things at once, so we probably have to use at least two different
programs to cover everything. The most common way to make the split is
to use different programs for contesting and non-contesting operation.
I'm looking at splitting it a different way: using the same program for
all my operating, and something else for the non-operating tasks.
There are advantages and disadvantages both ways, and of course it's
everybody's personal choice.
> - I have not explored using its features for dxing yet but can see the
>advantages of being more familiar with the features when you contest
>with it - I find I have to have some practice in the week b4 the
>contest to re familiarize myself with the software.
That's exactly what I'm trying to avoid. I'm trying to stay up to speed
with the operating interface all the time, so I only need to familiarize
myself with the specific contest.
>If you have the time I would be interested in hearing any tips you can
>pass on your N1mm set up for dxing (direct rather than on this
>reflector perhaps).
>
Nothing special at all. With all Windows logging programs, the main
thing is to decide on how much information to keep on-screen at the same
time, and how to arrange the windows.
As an extreme example of the amount that can be squeezed into on screen,
while still remaining reasonably understandable, look at F6IRF's SO2R
RTTY setup (which happens to use N1MM but would also work in WL):
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1444/1457/1600/n1mm@f6irf%20(Small).jp
g
--
73 from Ian G/GM3SEK
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list