[UK-CONTEST] Contest: Test Message vs Morse
Dave Sergeant
dave at davesergeant.com
Mon May 16 03:52:51 EDT 2005
On 15 May 2005 at 21:45, Dave Lawley wrote:
> A few weeks ago the story was on the news that a 93 year-old
> telegrapher in Australia had beaten a youngster in a competition to
> see which was the faster way of sending a message: SMS text or Morse
> code.
>
> On Friday evening in the US on the Jay Leno show, a similar test was
> set up. One of the Morse guys was Chip, K7JA who some of you might
> have met at the RSGB HF Convention last October. Scott KA9FOX has put
> some recordings of that part of the show onto the web, see the email
> below from cq-contest.
>
> Dave G4BUO
>
> ------------------------------------------
There has been quite a lot of discussion about this on the Elecraft
reflector, and the comments from Ken K6CTW who was at the receiving
end in the show make interesting reading. I have copied these below.
It looks as if this was a serious effort to prove the point. But
surely the point is that SMS entry is highly inefficient - the chap
on the mobile apparently was a world leader who could enter 160
characters a minute - I guess few of us can achieve even a fraction
of that when texting! And 28wpm is pretty pedestrian compared with
what the top CW ops can send!
All good fun...
73 Dave G3YMC
*********************
>From Elecraft Reflector:
All,
Well to answer some of the questions I have received:
1. Ben was just getting ready to start entering the last 2 words
when I was done.
2. None of us had any idea of the text we would be sending, not only
for the "show" but also for the 3 rehersals (in which we smoked em
every time)
3. Chip, K7JA was sending and I, Ken, K6CTW was receiving.
4. The radios were FT-817's provided by Chip's company Yaesu and HRO.
Reason for that choice was that we needed the most frequency agile
radios we could get. When I talked to the technical folks, they
recommended we START at 2 meters and go up because of all of the
lower frequency noise and RFI from the other TV equipment. When I
got there, we took out a spectrum analyzer and studied all of the
interference possibilities. I ended up choosing 432.200 MHz because
that guaranteed no RFI from their equipment and we were high enough
not to overload their front ends either. This was then verified and
it was what we were using at the FT-817's lowest setting.
5. I already knew that 28-30 wpm would easily keep us in front of
even the current world record holder, and also it is the fastest
speed that I can make nice readable copy on paper with a "stick".
6. The telegrapher "costumes" were the producer's idea but it was fun
for both Chip and I.
7. In rehersal I, K6CTW had a number of lines which would have
really done a nice job of plugging ham radio and telegraphy however
at our last dress rehersal, they decided to cut them out to make the
segment "fit". (maybe next time).
8. I decided that I would be the receiver because I'm not bothered by
crowd noise etc.
If you enjoyed the segment, PLEASE email, write, etc. to let "The
Tonight Show" know about it. That way we may have a chance for a
bigger segment next time.
Thanks for the kind comments from all and let's keep on having fun!
(It is a hobby after all).
73,
Ken, K6CTW
*****************
*A few more points for clarification: When my XYL, Connie, originally
answered the call, at my home, from the producers of the show, she
explained that I operated both codes and that I considered myself to
be a good but not exceptional operator. However, she is the one who
"sold" the producers that the skit could work. She also did a VERY
credible job of explaining Morse telegraphy and the radio code and
its uses. (You all might think to send her a thanks too as without
her, this would never have happened (email address deleted ) When
they contacted me later that afternoon, I explained that my wife was
correct, I am a competent CW and Morse operator. Your point is
interesting in that they did try and get the fastest text messengers
they could fly in. I did however explain that if the Tonight Show
folks had been able to get the equivalent world record holder in CW
to do this, it would have been at almost TRIPLE the speed we were
going at. The reason, as I have explained before, that we worked at
about 28 or so wpm is that this is the fastest speed that I can make
nice readable copy with a pencil as they did not have the ability to
let me use a typewriter for copy (and I thought they were going to do
a camera shot of my copy for verification). Also, since we did not
have the time to set up headphones, I just added some extra volume
for me, had the stage folks cut my mike (to prevent feedback and
overload) and copied off of the speaker. To re-emphasize the point,
I'm just an average CW op who occasionally operates the CW SS QRP,
whith my K2 of course, and really enjoys CW, and traffic handling. By
the way, the radios used were Chip's not from Yaesu and the backup
radios were from HRO.
73, Ken, K6CTW *
http://www.davesergeant.com
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list