[UK-CONTEST] QRO

Bob Henderson bob at 5b4agn.net
Sun Apr 2 01:06:03 EST 2006


Gerry

The old and faithfull Inverse Square Law reveals the tissue heating risk
from 1.2kW at a distance of 3 metres as rather less than that from 1W at 2
cm. Not only that but 120kW at 18 MHz will only present the same tissue
heating risk as that 1.2kW on 1800 MHz.

That we have yet to be granted our 120kW 17m licenses (or tee hee, our 1.2
Megawatt Topband permits) suggests regulatory concern is other than one of
public health risk.

Bob, 5B4AGN

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerard Lynch" <gerrylynch at freenetname.co.uk>
To: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] QRO


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Henderson" <bob at 5b4agn.net>
>
> > For everyone's sake, let's bring back the science.
>
> Please, particularly for those of us for whom 10 metres antenna separation
> from residential property is an unattainable luxury.
>
> Several of the blocks of flats on this estate have 1.2kW GSM transmitters
no
> more than 3 metres above the top floor dwellings.  If a rare cancer
cluster
> appears here, I'll let you all know, but the best current scientific
> evidence is that that is not going to do anyone a button of harm and 1.5
kW
> of HF certainly won't.  Leaky computer mouse cables, unshielded hi-fi
> speaker leads, crappy wideband TV amps, yes, but people, no.
>
> If we aren't capable of sorting hysteria out from fact then how do we
expect
> Joe Public to?  It's difficult enough being an urban amateur already,
thank
> you very much.
>
> 73
>
> Gerry G0RTN
> Vanity Page at http://www.gerrylynch.co.uk
> "In days of old, when ops were bold, and sidebands not invented,
> The word would pass, by pounding brass, and all were well contented."
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>




More information about the UK-Contest mailing list