[UK-CONTEST] Fw: P3J BERU 2006
Alan Jubb - 5B4AHJ
g3pmr at shacklog.co.uk
Tue Mar 14 01:34:55 EST 2006
Originally sent yesterday, but bounced due to size. I have now removed the
formatting, so hopefully it will be OK this time.
Also, originally written before I had seen Brian 5B/G4ODV's post.
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Jubb - 5B4AHJ
To: UK Contest Reflector
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: P3J BERU 2006
Hi all.
Interesting contest from a number of angles.
This year, thanks to Bob, 5B4AGN, I was able to operate from his
super-station, whereas last year I operated from my "little pistol" station.
( I have since moved QTH and don't yet have any decent antennas at the new
QTH, hence Bob's kind offer)
I also put in a lot of time studying propagation charts (which I didn't do
last year), and composed an operating plan based on this.
I also resolved to spend more time trawling for bonuses, as my notes for
last year indicated that that was an area that I could improve on.
As a result of these three factors I expected to beat last year's score out
of sight, but it was not to be. Here are the comparative results:
2005 - figures from the published results, 6th place, Open section.
====
80m 40m 20m 15m 10m Total
QSOs 63 191 247 178 49 728
Bonus 15 43 50 35 19 162
Score 6809
2006, Open section
====
These figures are the tweaked scores from WL. Tweaking required as WL still
scores 9M6 and 2E as 0 points, and this year counted VAn and VEn as separate
bonusses.
80m 40m 20m 15m 10m Total
QSOs 50 283 280 139 4 749
Bonus 11 49 55 15 4 134
Score 6475
So what went wrong?
1. Power line noise
Bob warned me that his QTH sometimes suffers from QRN from nearby HV
overhead power lines.
Indeed, in the first few hours of the contest this noise definitely slowed
things down, as I had to ask for numerous repeats of serial numbers, and am
sure that I missed some weak signals. This mainly affected 15m and 20m, and
possibly 10m. Thankfully the noise went away late afternoon on Saturday, but
it did re-appear around 09:15z for a short time, just before the end of the
contest, on Sunday morning. This again slowed things down as I was having a
niced run of Gs on 15m at the time.
2. Propagation
Where the bands were in reasonable shape (20m and 40m) my results, as
anticipated, were better than last year.
However, 10m was virtually dead. My first 4 QSOs of the contest (7Q, 9J, VU,
ZC4) were all I had on the band. This was inspite of frequent CQs with the
beam pointed at G and also Africa, and also two G's moving me to 10m to try
for a QSO, but without success. Having said that, I noted from G3LET's
comments that he worked Brian 5B/G4ODV on the band, so I certainly missed
out somehow. It will be interesting to see what else Brian worked on 10m.
15m was in relatively poor shape. The long path opening to VK/ZL on Sunday
morning was very weak. All but one of the LP QSOs to VK/ZL on this band
resulted in me moving the VK/ZLs from 20m. On the plus side, in the last
hour of the contest saw collossal G signals, and I was able to run at high
rate for a while (until the QRN returned), which at least enabled last
year's QSO total to be exceeded, which had looked unlikely a couple of hours
earlier.
80m was poor. After a CQ I could hear many stations calling, presumably Gs,
but there were so many weak signals that all I could hear was a mush. S&P
produced better results. The inability to pull these stations out of the
noise is probably down to my inexperience. This was a band where I had
expected to do much better than from my own station, as last year I only had
a low 80m inverted vee slung up temporarily for the contest.
40m and 20m were where the bulk of the QSOs were to be had, although even
there I missed some bonusses. African stations were scarce, where were the
ZS stations? There were quite a few around last year but I didn't work a
single ZS this year.
3. Sleep patterns
Unusually, I had had poor sleep pattern the few nights before the contest,
culminating in very little sleep Friday night. This certainly didn't help
the concentration when the going was so painfully slow overnight, and I did
nod off for a while. I think that George's (5B4AGC) decision to operate in
the Restricted section was very wise. I expect he achieved a similar score
to mine and got a decent night's sleep!
4. Operator experience
Same operator both times (obviously), but I wonder whether I was able to
take full advantage of Bob's very fine station, which was a pleasure to
operate from. Bob's station is set up for SO2R, which I had a dabble with
when things were slow. Worked Bob 9H3JT on 80m on the second radio, and
realised afterwards that I was only running 30w as the amp was not in
'operate' mode! However, I think SO2R may have been more of a diversion than
a benefit in this case. I need some practice with it.
5. Overall feelings
- It was great to operate from a high class station, and many thanks to Bob
for allowing that. On the rare occasions that there was a significant run I
was able to achieve higher rates than I ever have from my own station.
- Disappointment at the score. I still need to work hard on my bonus rate,
something which I say after every contest!
- I enjoy this contest immensly inspite of the tedious going overnight.
- It will be interesting to see the scores achieved by the other 5B
stations. That will be telling!
- I had an unusually high number of callers who were dupes this year. I even
had a ZL move me from 20 to 40, only to find we'd already worked on 40!.
- Thanks to all for the QSOs, and see you next year.
BTW, I've been asked why I use P3J and not 5B4AHJ, in this 'gentleman's'
contest. The main reason that I get so many people reading my call as
5B4ASJ, and also HB4 (although the latter wouldn't happen in BERU.)
BTW2, VU2NXM and VU2UR both sent HQ on some but not all of their exchanges.
Are they HQ stations? Did anyone else experience this?
73
Alan 5B4AHJ, P3J
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list