[UK-CONTEST] Wintest CW
Chris Tran
zl1ct at gm7v.com
Mon Nov 20 12:32:25 EST 2006
Hi Chris et al
Chris G3SJJ wrote :
>The point I was making about speeding up in messages was that software
>writers have an obligation to promote good practice and I certainly
>don't consider speeding and leaving out callsign in TU messages to be
>that. The other point is that whenever you say or send anything, you are
>marketing yourself to attract punters. Speeded up messages interrupts
>the rhythmical flow, sounds bad and may deter callers. I felt uncomfortable
>with >my WT messages on Saturday, the delay between His
>Call and Exchange seemed maybe 2 characters and didn't appear to flow
>well. I need to look at that.
Not quite sure what you mean by 'leaving out callsign in TU messages' - the
'+' key can be configured to whatever you like (default is TU + own call) as
can the 'Insert' key, with zero delay/space between the call and exchange if
you wish (not a good idea)
I disagree about the 'speed up' - I think Jose CT1BOH has had quite a lot of
input on the 'Operating techniques' side of WT and many of his ideas are
worth copying. On the basis that a G station will always be in Z14, then the
5nnA4 is wasted time and should be sent as fast as possible - anyone
listening to your pile-up for more than a few seconds will know that this is
how you are sending the exchange and the 'speed-up' might just help them
know when you are actually transmitting (assuming the pile-up are not all WT
users, hi) It's easy to remove the 'speed-up' anyway.
I'm guessing most of your concerns about WT will disappear once you have
used it in a major event like WW CW ?
++73--
++Chris--
++GM3WOJ--
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list