[UK-CONTEST] Remote Operation

[Don Beattie]

But surely she could use her own call (with appropriate country prefix for 
where the station is) and /A or /P as necessary.

Then you would not, I think, need to supervise !  Or have I missed something 
?

73

Don, G3BJ




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cooper, Stewart" <coopers at odl.co.uk>
To: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Remote Operation


>
> So...
> If a radio club has a station with a club call, they could run their 
> station with the ability to connect remotely, and 'members' could operate 
> from their homes. I believe this would be within the terms of the licence.
> I'm certainly not driving to Milton Keynes every time she wants to 
> operate! I find it sad that technology has progressed to a point where we 
> can do these things now, and now we have legislation which is effectively 
> preventing it. Linda can't erect antennas where she lives, so this is a 
> good solution to get her (and potentially others) on the radio bands.
> But at least she won't have to keep a log!
> Stewart
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com on behalf of Chris Tran
> Sent: Thu 07/09/2006 22:31
> To: uk-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Remote Operation
>
>
>
> Hi Colin et al
>>
>> Yes, M0CMK may operate your station remotely as per the new Clause 3(2)
>> providing you are directly supervising the operating i.e. at her
>> location -
>>
> I am a bit puzzled by this interpretation of 'direct supervision' - it is
> obviously impractical for Stewart to travel to Linda's QTH (Linda is our
> excellent GM7V/GZ7V QSL manager as well!) when Linda wants to use the
> station, but surely for the duration of the remote operation the station
> could be regarded as Linda's station (i.e. MM0CMK) ?
>
> Alternatively, if Stewart is monitoring the operation of the station,
> whether by being in his shack beside the equipment, or over the internet,
> does this not constitute 'direct supervision' ?
>
> 73
> Chris
> GM3WOJ
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
> Scanned by IFB SafeMail http://www.ifb.net for virus content.
> IFB Spam-Score:whitelisted
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Offshore Design Ltd
>
> www.odl.co.uk
>
> This email is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
> contain confidential
> and privileged information. You should not disclose its contents to any 
> other person. Any
> unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you 
> are not the
> intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately.
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>