[UK-CONTEST] Radcom Contest Results

Justin Snow justin at g4tsh.demon.co.uk
Tue Apr 24 14:43:44 EDT 2007


I don't think it is appropriate to prune the results in this way at all!
By all means restrict the lists to call, club, score, placing and have 
all the extra stuff like Mults, QSO's etc on the www.  But to publish 
the top few like has been done this month, with no indication that this 
has been done, is simply not acceptable to me.

The new editor is making his mark for all the wrong reasons by me and 
the formatting of the results page is sloppy in the extreme.

Justin, G4TSH


Peter Hobbs wrote:
> I heartily welcome the recent editorial changes at Radcom, however the published results seem now to be limited to the first 20 places (May issue).  This has all been discussed in this forum as being a reasonable compromise between space and exposure, but it doesn't do much to encourage new  or casual participants.  Perhaps we have a new "award structure" to see who can get their call published!  
>
> Seriously though, where this is done,  I do think it would be appropriate to include a link in the report to the full published results.  Who has the influence to achieve this?
>
> 73, Peter G3LET
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>   


More information about the UK-Contest mailing list