[UK-CONTEST] UK-Contest Digest, Vol 60, Issue 14

[G3SJJ]

Sorry, Roger, I rose to the bait and was not specific enough. I think 
the original posting mentioned paid staff. In which case my thoughts 
were that out-sourcing back to volunteers would be less of a strain on 
Society finances and therefore a good thing. Many of the Societies 
activities are carried out by volunteers, if we had to pay for all of 
those then the subs would run into £Ks pa.

My main concern is that all of us who hold a UK licence should support 
our national society in ALL of its endeavours by being a member and 
paying a full.
subscription.

73 Chris G3SJJ



G3SXW wrote:
> Does 'out-source' mean 'off-load' - does 'off-load' mean 'ditch'?
> Get real, guys. Stop stirring.
> 73 de Roger/G3SXW.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk>
> To: "uk-contest" <uk-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 1:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] UK-Contest Digest, Vol 60, Issue 14
>
>
>   
>> I'm new - well new'ish and I'm concerned about the buro, but if they off
>> load it - who pays for it?
>>
>>
>> On 16/12/07 12:30, "uk-contest-request at contesting.com"
>> <uk-contest-request at contesting.com> sent:
>>
>>     
>>> Totally agree with you Neil. I also think that off-loading QSLs would be
>>> a good idea. It must be a drain on Society resources.
>>>       
>> -- 
>> Power is no substitute for Skill.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>