[UK-CONTEST] 80M CC G3SJJ

[G3SJJ]

Whoop. I meant ENN NNN

G3SJJ wrote:
> Interesting. I made a note of 3 Eu callsigns during ARRL. T96Q had wide 
> noise sidebands as Dave mentioned. 4O1A had clix and parasitic such that 
> I  had to tune across 40KHz to find the main signal, HG9N was a rough 
> note also. I noted YZ1U as well but not sure why!
>
> Like Alan says most W signals were adequate in comparison, probably with 
> the exception of some older TenTec users.
>
> The other thing that was very noticeable was the absence of the missing 
> callsigns and speeded up stuff from the NA side. Worst Eu for that was 
> OE4A whose TST & ENNK was sent at 40+ wpm whilst his actually Q rate was 
> about half that!
>
> Mind you I do like the idea of ENN NN when we get our increased power 
> limit!! Nice one.
>
> Chris G3SJJ
>
>
> ALANNOTTAGE at aol.com wrote:
>   
>> In a message dated 23/02/07 08:14:49 GMT Standard Time, g4buo at compuserve.com 
>> writes:
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> This was a problem during the ARRL contest as well. At one point T96Q 
>>> was about 1.5kc from my frequency but his noise sidebands were making it 
>>> impossible to copy weak callers on my frequency. He was more T6 than T9.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Also, pretty much all US/VE sigs that I heard were de-clicked.  EU sigs were 
>> in marked contrast quite frequently!
>>
>>
>> Al G0XBV   
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>