[UK-CONTEST] 160m Club Calls

[Jonathan G0DVJ]

But if Reading were enough, why would some of us bother to both give  
and pedantically copy exactly the detail of (what stations give in)  
the exchange?

I really shouldn't rise to the bait ... we already had this thread a  
couple of months ago !   Sorry

Jonathan G0DVJ
--


On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:06 pm, G3SJJ wrote:

> As far as I am concerned Callum, Reading ought to be enough.  
> Anyway, did
> you really work W3BN in Cub Calls? Good going for an "estate"  
> antenna on
> topband!
>
> Chris G3SJJ
>
>
> Callum M0MCX wrote:
>> Sorry to bring this old chestnut up again, it's just that someone has
>> recently asked in the CDXC Yahoo reflector about getting in touch  
>> with
>> Reading Radio Club. I did a search on Google just to be  
>> inquisitive and I
>> noticed that there's a Reading Radio Club -AND- a Reading and  
>> District
>> Amateur Radio Club.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now I realise why my contest log wasn't "accurate enough" for  
>> scrutinizers
>> after its submission for the Club Calls contest. I had marked too  
>> many of my
>> READING club entries,  "READING" when in fact I should have been more
>> specific (eg Radio Club or DARC).
>>
>>
>>
>> It's the first time I entered that contest - with a compromise  
>> "estate"
>> antenna (in other words, bloody difficult conditions!) and now the  
>> penny has
>> really dropped; the aims of the contest -vs- the difficulty of  
>> 160m -vs- the
>> pedantically scrutinised exchange = I'll not be entering that one  
>> again.
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> Callum
>>
>> M0MCX
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest