[UK-CONTEST] G0MTN CQWW SSB report
Lee Volante
lee at g0mtn.freeserve.co.uk
Sat Nov 3 06:23:56 EST 2007
Hi all,
Better late than never...
I've entered SO AB for the past few years in the LP and HP categories. One
consistent disappointment has been the lack of multipliers worked compared
with some of my peers. This year, trying the Assisted section, the
multiplier scores were similar. So perhaps I should take some comfort that I
wasn't missing too much through operator error, misunderstanding the
propagation, or not shouting long / loud enough. Nearing the end of the
contest, the band maps showed I'd worked almost everyone calling CQ, with
remaining mults being tagged in the inaudible or impossible category (CW
should allow more of these to be worked.) Instead, my new focus should be
"why aren't my antennas better / higher so I can work these extra guys"
rather than beating myself up for my on-air performance (unless I really am
a lid op!)
Also, it's a mistake believing that all mults need to be searched for. There
will be some very rare guys with 100w and a wire etc. who will be mostly, or
exclusively Search and Pounce. Some stations I've spoken to mentioned
running a pileup with single and double multipliers all calling them at some
stage. I believe there is a saying "Let the mults come to you" (for some of
them at least!) which requires being loud. There have also been comments on
some blogs that unless you possess, say, monobanders at least 60 feet and
quite a bit of power, running on 20m will be nigh-on impossible (cliff edge,
rare DX stations excepted.) Any flaw in station location, antennas, power
output is shown up for CQ WW phone. The CW contest, or any less busy contest
is far more forgiving.
And QSO volume is important - especially DX volume, and I need to call CQ
for that. 15m, and especially 10m on the Saturday morning allowed some of
this, but mostly to EU. I noted I had twice as many QSOs with the USA on
15m as 20m, as I could actually call CQ there, whereas the big USA M/M
stations saw most traffic back to G on 20m. CQ'ing on 40m was actually most
productive in the mornings when most folk have already moved up to 20m and
15m. There was room to call, and still enough EU traffic on 40m to be
hoovered up to at least get some QSOs / rate in the log, even if they were
all 1 point. When 20m collapsed for me early Sunday evening, and 40m was
not generating QSOs, it was time to go to 80m. It seemed very early, but I
think I need to be on bands early and late before the hordes arrive.
I 'only' did around 40 hours as a semi-casual operation - allowing myself an
extra hour in bed on the Friday night, sat down for dinner with the YL, and
had a reasonable sleep on the Saturday night. (Actually, I turned off two
alarm clocks and went back to sleep without any memory of it happening. I
think this has happened before too - new contest tip will be to move alarm
clocks so they are out of reach of my bed !) So I wasn't too tired after
the contest as I have been previously, but then going into work overnight
for a further night with hardly any sleep took it's toll.
So overall it was a bit of a struggle as expected, but considering
conditions and my station I don't think I should have been expecting much
more. (I have worked more on 160m / 80m / 40m in the past though.) Not much
from Zone 3, Zone 25, and well from half the planet really from looking at
the summary. But no other SSB contest will generate as many QSOs overall,
nor to so many DXCC entities. Other events may allow me to run more, and
have higher peak rates, but the overall volume would not be so high at the
end of 24 / 36 / 48 hours.
Congrats to everyone - big scores or small - who took part.
SOAB(A) HP (well, medium power if we're honest) Still mostly S+P, 80% EU.
QSOs Zones Countries Multipliers Score
160m: 57 4 25
80m: 232 7 46
40m: 199 10 52
20m: 423 22 77
15m: 441 20 86
10m: 312 12 48
Totals: 1664 75 334 409 964831
73,
Lee G0MTN
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list