[UK-CONTEST] VHF Contesting Activity
David, G3YYD
g3yyd at btinternet.com
Tue Dec 9 11:23:49 EST 2008
Ray
With the changes made it does not answer the problem of challenge and
reward. HF contesting provides a really rich environment to work in. The
levels of skill needed to be a reasonable contester are much much
higher. Let us take CQ WW contests. There are 6 bands of propagation to
juggle with, knowing when to run and when to S&P. When to change band.
Understanding how to maximum scores not just QSOs. When is the best time
to take time out and have some sleep/refreshment for a SO. With multi
ops when do I schedule which operator to get the best result with all
their different abilities and skills. What category should I enter. What
are the technical aspects I need to have in place? I can make well over
1,000 QSOs in a HF weekend contest and the top SO2R ops probably above
2,000 QSOs.
How do you get that sort of skill demand and activity level in a VHF
contest? Basically you can't for a straight VHF contest.
I was at this year's HF convention and a contest university was run, it
was packed to standing room only. OK many were experienced contesters,
but most were not. Is there a VHF and above equivalent? If there is, I
have never heard of it. How about holding contest universities for VHF
and above?
I take the point about within UK contests. Judging by what I hear on 80M
then within UK HF contests are very popular with attendant high QRM
levels as the band does not have enough bandwidth and that is also part
of the challenge. How can we get an equivalent on say 2M? How about the
guys who have excellent QTHs and dominate the results? Why not like
BARTG RTTY contests have a compulsory expert category for those who made
a top ten position in any of the last 3 years- incidentally I am the
only G currently in that BARTG category. This then gives a chance to the
guys with poorer QTHs to do well in a category.
I take the point about weak signal work, yep I can get about 2200KM from
my QTH with enhanced propagation may be a little more if I am lucky to
2500KM. Most of the time there is no enhanced propagation so I am
limited to about 500 to 600KM on troposcatter. Quite frankly that is
nothing compared to what can be done on HF and even on 160M where I can
exceed that maximum VHF enhanced range every night. What is the
incentive for me to use my 2M station for DXing when I find 160M DXing a
much greater challenge then the simplicity of 2 metres with its low
activity levels?
There may be a lot of clubs around, but unless the members find
contesting interesting the clubs will not do it. Amateur Radio is a
voluntary activity and to get people to do things the "landscape" needs
to be gardened to enable them to have enthusiasm and drive in that area.
The VHF contesting activity speaks for itself about how people are
responding in the current climate. So how can the climate be changed and
I for one would suggest need to start looking at why within UK HF
contests are so popular and how to link with those contests to encourage
VHF contest activity. May be initially as gaining bonus point alongside
an HF club/team contest? We need to think creatively and step outside
the VHF/HF silo mentality.
David G3YYD
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list