[UK-CONTEST] OT - ZA operation

[Colin]

Folks,

May I remind everyone that BR68 is no longer valid and was replaced by 
the new licence document (not numbered).

Because of the changes to which Bob refers there is a footnote at the 
bottom of page 2 that states -

"A list of countries that have implemented TR61-01 is available from the 
European Communications Office website at http://ero.dk/"

Clause 16 of the new licence also refers.

73

Colin, G3PSM

Bob G3PJT wrote:
> Gentlemen,
> The ERO document site is the reference document source, everything else 
> is probably out of date or just plain wrong..
> Look at http://www.erodocdb.dk//docs/doc98/official/pdf/TR6101.PDF  ( 
> latest update 28 Sept 2008)
>
> Countries can be part of CEPT but have NOT adopted T/R 51-01 etc etc.. 
> This is the case with ZA, RA, HV, etc etc.  Unbelievably there  are a 
> lot of other CEPT agreements, not just radio amateur ones!
>
> BR68 really should simply refer the reader to ERO website rather than 
> attempt to list out the situation, which changes on a regular basis as 
> administrations update their radio amateur legislation. And note also 
> that the licencing conditions in the country being visited might not be 
> th same as you enjoy in the UK.
>
> I will be at the HFC if anyone wants to chat about these matters. But I 
> still want to hear about any inconsistencies folks might find so that I 
> can try and sort them out, or clarify the CEPT wording.
> .
> 73 Bob G3PJT
>
>
> Roger G3SXW wrote:
>   
>> Hello again Peter,
>> You're right. My latest BR68 booklet (Of 178 Rev 0) shows Albania as 
>> CEPT.
>> But the CEPT web-site does not.
>> Over to you Bob (G3PJT) - maybe you can clarify?
>> If it is CEPT I might take a quick trip down there!
>> There are other inconsistencies: BR68 shows Russia and Vatican City, 
>> for example, as CEPT (T/R 61-01) but erodoc says 'not implemented'.
>> It's a mess and we travellers do really WANT to stick to the rules, so 
>> the rules need to be clear-cut. Surely the CEPT (ero) web-site is the 
>> gold standard?
>> 73 de Roger/G3SXW.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Hobbs" <peter at tilgate.co.uk>
>> To: "Roger G3SXW" <g3sxw at btinternet.com>; "Nigel G3TXF" <Nigel at G3TXF.com>
>> Cc: "UK Contest reflector" <uk-contest at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 12:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] OT - ZA operation
>>
>>
>>     
>>> Hi men
>>>
>>> Thanks for your replies.  It's listed  with all the others on the 
>>> BR68, with
>>> a fairly explicit statement.
>>> http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/ra/publication/ra_info/br68r11/br68.htm 
>>>
>>> Are you really sure?
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger G3SXW" <g3sxw at btinternet.com>
>>> To: "Peter Hobbs" <peter at tilgate.co.uk>; "UK Contest reflector"
>>> <uk-contest at contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 11:28 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] OT - ZA operation
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hello Peter,
>>>> No, Albania has NOT signed up to CEPT. See:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.erodocdb.dk/doks/implement_doc_adm.aspx?docid=1802
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy your visit.
>>>> 73 de Roger/G3SXW.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Hobbs" <peter at tilgate.co.uk>
>>>> To: "UK Contest reflector" <uk-contest at contesting.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 6:46 PM
>>>> Subject: [UK-CONTEST] OT - ZA operation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> On the face of it, Albania is now one of the CEPT nations.  Anyone 
>>>>> tried
>>>>> it out in practice?  Will be there for two weeks on business later 
>>>>> this
>>>>> month.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>> Peter G3LET
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> UK-Contest mailing list
>>>>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest 
>>>>>           
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>