[UK-CONTEST] CC April CW TX Bandwidth

[Colin]

I am not aware of causing problems with my old FT1000MP so if anyone has
noticed clicks from me please let me know.

What should the FT1000MP owner look for to see if it has been modified?

73

Colin, G3PSM


David, G3YYD wrote:
> I also have a FT1000MP which I modified years ago. It is very easy to do 
> and makes a huge difference to occupied bandwidth. If anyone needs help 
> to do the mod I will gladly help them. Note however the FT1000MP is not 
> the worst offender.
>
> I agree those who do occupy excessive bandwidth should be told, but how 
> often does any one tell an offender? Those who continue to offend should 
> then be penalised may be at first by being placed at the bottom of the 
> table rather than out right disqualification.
>
> David G3YYD
>
> Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
>   
>> David, G3YYD wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Personally I think a better area to look at is how to curb those whose 
>>> transmitted bandwidth is excessive as they are reducing the number of 
>>> slots available to everyone else.
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> Agreed with both David and Roger LDI. There are still  far too many 
>> un-neutered FT1000s and similar public nuisances wandering around.
>>
>> The time has already arrived when it's possible for the HFCC to record 
>> the whole of a CW CC contest for later inspection, and at the very least 
>> start to send out some warning e-mails - complete with samples of the 
>> evidence.
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>   

-- 

*/Colin J. Thomas, G3PSM/*

*/External Relations Committee Chairman,/*

*/International Amateur Radio Union, Region 1/*

*/Tel:     +44 8048 2749/*

*/GSM:  +44 7759 548982/*

*/Email: colin at g3psm.net/*