[UK-CONTEST] CC April CW TX Bandwidth

[Danny Higgins]

People with key clicks are probably not aware of it.  Instead of "599K 
001" you could always send "597 001" or "5NK 001".  Stations sending 
such a report should not be penalised if it is not acknowledged by the 
receiving station and stations receiving several such reports should be 
penalised.  The same applies to splatter from overdriven amplifiers, of 
which there was one particular culprit in the last SSB contest.

Danny, G3XVR

David, G3YYD wrote:
> I also have a FT1000MP which I modified years ago. It is very easy to do 
> and makes a huge difference to occupied bandwidth. If anyone needs help 
> to do the mod I will gladly help them. Note however the FT1000MP is not 
> the worst offender.
>
> I agree those who do occupy excessive bandwidth should be told, but how 
> often does any one tell an offender? Those who continue to offend should 
> then be penalised may be at first by being placed at the bottom of the 
> table rather than out right disqualification.
>
> David G3YYD
>
> Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
>   
>> David, G3YYD wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Personally I think a better area to look at is how to curb those whose 
>>> transmitted bandwidth is excessive as they are reducing the number of 
>>> slots available to everyone else.
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> Agreed with both David and Roger LDI. There are still  far too many 
>> un-neutered FT1000s and similar public nuisances wandering around.
>>
>> The time has already arrived when it's possible for the HFCC to record 
>> the whole of a CW CC contest for later inspection, and at the very least 
>> start to send out some warning e-mails - complete with samples of the 
>> evidence.
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Text inserted by Panda IS 2009:
>
>  This message has NOT been classified as spam. If it is unsolicited mail (spam), click on the following link to reclassify it: http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_375&SPAM=true&path=C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Danny\Local%20Settings\Application%20Data\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Internet%20Security%202009\AntiSpam
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>