[UK-CONTEST] SSB vs CW
Darrell G0HVQ
g0hvq at talktalk.net
Fri Jan 23 11:31:15 EST 2009
Same here. Considering not bothering with the SSB event at all this year.
CW definately has the edge for us smaller stations, in CQWW CW I was making
QSOs right from the start, whereas in SSB it was hard work for the first few
hours (3 or 4 calls needed to bag a QSO in S&P), probably because there were
so many people on and consequenetly a higher pecentage with higher ERP than
me.
73
Darrell G0HVQ
.....recently converted CW contester :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "William & Jennifer Sefton" <g7pvz at btinternet.com>
To: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:53 AM
Subject: [UK-CONTEST] SSB vs CW
> Interesting points...
>
> My CW effort produced more qso's than the SSB. Never the less, best
> contest I've done in ages. Both events were done with the same toys, the
> Icom IC-703, 10 watts and a full size G5RV. To quote a good friend, QRP is
> FUN. (Thanks G3YMC)
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill G7PVZ
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.12/1911 - Release Date:
> 23/01/2009 07:28
>
>
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list