[UK-CONTEST] RSGB contests
Alex GM3ZBE
alex at gm3zbe.plus.com
Thu Apr 29 02:04:19 PDT 2010
Exactly Chris, that is the proper way to resolve it, indulging in
deliberate QRM is just escalating the problem.
Alex, GM3ZBE
Chris G3SJJ wrote:
> Ian, you seem to suggest the only way to resolve the situation is for
> contest sponsors to take unilateral action.
>
> Deliberate QRM by those who feel aggrieved is not the answer but
> discussion and negotation could be. Instead of DQRMing why don't the
> aggrieved groups contact their national societies and enagage the
> Contest Committees in discussion?
>
> I know from personal experience of 15 years on the HF Contests Committee
> that the RSGB has over the years been very sensitive to issues such as
> DX windows. In fact in recent recent years I felt it necessary to raise
> the issue of scrapping a non-contest zone which was not serving any
> purpose but having a negative effect on the UK contesting. In the RSGB
> 1.8MHz we were limited to a lower edge of 1820, instead of 1810. The CW
> segment has already been narrowed in recent years by the somewhat
> puzzling appearance of SSB around 1840. I was pleased to see that we are
> now allowed to go down to 1810. I don't think 2 x 4 hour sessions during
> a year are going to cause a problem!
>
> We currently have a great wealth of experienced negotiators, such as
> G3BJ, G3XXT, G4BUO, GW3SQX who I am sure would be most willing to sit
> round a table and discuss the issues.
>
> What's the problem with this approach?
>
> Chris G3SJJ
>
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list