[UK-CONTEST] RSGB Contest Committee

Danny Higgins danny.higgins at keme.co.uk
Sat Aug 7 12:54:02 PDT 2010


Thanks Paul.

I wasn't aware that there was no longer a minimum RS(T) requirement.  I
thought it used to be 337.  This means that my one and only QSO with P29 now
counts.  He gave me Q5 and S0 because I wasn't moving his S Meter!

Danny, G3XVR

-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul O'Kane
Sent: 07 August 2010 20:32
To: uk-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] RSGB Contest Committee

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <mark.haynes at yahoo.co.uk>

> The signal report is a prompt that the number is to follow.

The Sprints have demonstrated that what you don't expect,
you don't miss.

> When I did the RAE, I was taught that a signal report MUST
> be sent and received for it to be a valid QSO,

On the contrary, the minimum requirement for a valid QSO
is the 2-way exchange and acknowledgement of callsigns.

It may not be generally known or accepted yet, but it
is nevertheless a fact that no signal reports of any
kind are needed on QSLs for DXCC.

73,
Paul EI5DI




_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest



More information about the UK-Contest mailing list