[UK-CONTEST] RSGB Contest Committee

[Tom Wylie]

LOTW does not record RST reports.   If you download your log back from 
LOTW you will see that it does not contain RST reports.   I 
inadvertently lost my ZB2 log and downloaded it back from LOTW and there 
were no RTS reports in the ADIF file which i had uploaded to BV7...

Tom
GM4FDM

On 07/08/2010 19:54, Danny Higgins wrote:
> Thanks Paul.
>
> I wasn't aware that there was no longer a minimum RS(T) requirement.  I
> thought it used to be 337.  This means that my one and only QSO with P29 now
> counts.  He gave me Q5 and S0 because I wasn't moving his S Meter!
>
> Danny, G3XVR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul O'Kane
> Sent: 07 August 2010 20:32
> To: uk-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] RSGB Contest Committee
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:<mark.haynes at yahoo.co.uk>
>
>> The signal report is a prompt that the number is to follow.
>
> The Sprints have demonstrated that what you don't expect,
> you don't miss.
>
>> When I did the RAE, I was taught that a signal report MUST
>> be sent and received for it to be a valid QSO,
>
> On the contrary, the minimum requirement for a valid QSO
> is the 2-way exchange and acknowledgement of callsigns.
>
> It may not be generally known or accepted yet, but it
> is nevertheless a fact that no signal reports of any
> kind are needed on QSLs for DXCC.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>