[UK-CONTEST] cqwwwpx

Chris G3SJJ g3sjj at btinternet.com
Sat May 28 03:15:28 PDT 2011


I agree Dave, but I think C4N is single op by 5B8AD, using SO2R with duelling enabled. I have also been listening for a while. It sounds very slick.  
He probably has some of those very narrow QRO transmit filters that the YT guys use. He keeps about 50KHz apart.

Good use of SO2R but like you I wonder about continuously using two channels on the same band.

73 Chris G3SJJ



On 28/05/2011 10:30, Dave Lawley wrote:
> Interleaving QSOs can be great fun - Andy and I made much use of this
> technique in WRTC, and practised beforehand in WPX and NFD (checklog
> only). However, we were not set up to interleave on the same band.
>
> The Russians have been doing this for a few years and have become very
> proficient at it. I have listened to them in some contests and have not
> heard their two run stations on a band ever break the single transmitted
> signal rule, clearly they use an effective interlock. I have great
> respect for them in identifying an effective and new technique, which as
> I said is great fun!
>
> However, not only is this a 'game changer' which effectively pushes the
> multi-single category even further away from the common-sense meaning of
> those words, but it could come close to doubling band occupancy! During
> major contests 40m and 20m are already stuffed to overflowing, and I do
> not think we could tolerate a situation where all the big multi-multi,
> multi-two and multi-single entrants routinely occupied two run
> frequencies. It is for this reason that I believe consideration is being
> given to banning it in the CQ WW contests and I feel that other major
> contest organisers should follow suit.
>
> 73, Dave G4BUO
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>


More information about the UK-Contest mailing list