[UK-CONTEST] cqwwwpx

[Alan Jubb - 5B4AHJ]

Hi Chris.
C4N is not single op on this occasion. Ops are: 5B8AD, RV6LNA, UA9CDV,
5B4AGM, UA6LV, UA6LP and RA6LFO.
73
Alan 5B4AHJ

On 28 May 2011 13:15, Chris G3SJJ <g3sjj at btinternet.com> wrote:

> I agree Dave, but I think C4N is single op by 5B8AD,
>
> 73 Chris G3SJJ
>
>
>
> On 28/05/2011 10:30, Dave Lawley wrote:
> > Interleaving QSOs can be great fun - Andy and I made much use of this
> > technique in WRTC, and practised beforehand in WPX and NFD (checklog
> > only). However, we were not set up to interleave on the same band.
> >
> > The Russians have been doing this for a few years and have become very
> > proficient at it. I have listened to them in some contests and have not
> > heard their two run stations on a band ever break the single transmitted
> > signal rule, clearly they use an effective interlock. I have great
> > respect for them in identifying an effective and new technique, which as
> > I said is great fun!
> >
> > However, not only is this a 'game changer' which effectively pushes the
> > multi-single category even further away from the common-sense meaning of
> > those words, but it could come close to doubling band occupancy! During
> > major contests 40m and 20m are already stuffed to overflowing, and I do
> > not think we could tolerate a situation where all the big multi-multi,
> > multi-two and multi-single entrants routinely occupied two run
> > frequencies. It is for this reason that I believe consideration is being
> > given to banning it in the CQ WW contests and I feel that other major
> > contest organisers should follow suit.
> >
> > 73, Dave G4BUO
> > _______________________________________________
> > UK-Contest mailing list
> > UK-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>



-- 
73
Alan 5B4AHJ-5B50J-P3J