[UK-CONTEST] cqwwwpx
Gerry Lynch
me at gerrylynch.co.uk
Mon May 30 06:52:34 PDT 2011
On 30/05/2011 14:08, Dez Watson wrote:
> C4N was/were definitely not transmitting more than one
> signal on the same band at any one time. They were
> interleaving/alternating between two frequencies, more than
> likely on different arrays. Perhaps 14005 on Europe and
> 14065 on Japan. C4N was often much stronger on one of the
> frequencies.
If they were using interlock, then it's entirely legit within the rules
and I happily withdraw any criticism.
I personally have no problem with that operating technique - it's a
clever use of technology to maximise the score within the rules. In some
ways it's no different to SO2R. If the contest community, however, feels
it isn't desirable, then it can make representations to the contest
organisers and they can change the rules - as Roger SXW has already
alluded to.
But personally I have no big problem with it.
73
Gerry ZS1/Gi0RTN
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list